The Imaginary Massacre of Benghazi: ?

The Imaginary Massacre of Benghazi is the whole foundation of the UN's morality to protect civilians by bombing Libya back to square one, and yet it was a complete lie. Everyone knows Gaddafi was a brutal dictator who slaughtered countless Libyans in the past 42 years, and who was welcomed back into the international community as the "great statesman" by the British in 2004.

Readers need to note (before jumping into hasty conclusions) that Gaddafi is not the issue here; the issue is destroying Libya's entire infrastructure for absolutely nothing but killing an "old man" and plunging the whole country into complete anarchy.

All Libyans know that Gaddafi in his historic speech was specifically referring to "armed rebels", whom he said he will hunt down door by door if they refused to surrender their arms – just as the installed NTC, GNC and the HoR found themselves (still) doing right now, if not much worse.

Of course, take no one's word for it because the best evidence for this is the speech itself which every Arabic-speaking student of Libya can listen to if they need to verify the correct terminology used by Gaddafi. What western politicians and readers are told by their media is something beyond anyone's control, but the "secret government" ruining the world.

 

Muammar Gaddafi's speech; Thursday 17 March 2011.

Gaddafi addressed the residents of Benghazi late on Thursday, warning them of an impending military operation during which "no mercy" will be shown to rebel fighters who refused to lay down their "weapons".

He also said that if they laid down their arms (at minute 03:33 of the video), then they have his "amnesty" and protection. This was interpreted to mean no mercy for the whole city and thus the so-called "massacre of Benghazi".

 

There was no reference to killing unarmed civilians or massacring Benghazi anywhere in his entire speech. Note that he also urged the Libyans to not surrender their honour to Qatar.

A year after Gaddafi's murder Libyans across the state of Libya were burning Qatari flags, and by 2017 Saudi Arabia, Egypt and UAE cut all relations with Qatar which they classified as terror-sponsoring state. It emerged later that Qatar and Turkey were funding militia groups aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood and Qaida (see GNA for more on this).

 

This is what al-Jazeera wrote on the screen during Gaddafi's speech: "Gaddafi tells Benghazi residents "we are coming tonight & there will be no mercy"". Now this sentence is misleading because it implies that there will be no mercy for the whole residents of Benghazi, whereas, as we heard above, there was no such threat to the people of Benghazi - he was specifically talking to criminals and terrorists who are carrying illegal weapons according to Libyan law at the time.

Making war-decisions based on an imaginary situation from the future based on exaggerated allegations should not warrant the total destruction of Libya's infrastructure without an exit strategy. This gross "misrepresentation" of truth was pointed out by Alan J. Kuperman, a professor at the University of Texas, in this interview: https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/j02uvYMKbh4

Abdul Jalil says Cyrenaica was liberated before the start of the UN bombing campaign.

Moreover, in an interview with 218 TV Channel NTC leader Mr. Abdul Jalil revealed that the whole of Cyrenaica was liberated before the UN bombing campaign began, and therefore there was no danger from Gaddafi whatsoever. This means that the UN order to bomb the entire Libya just to protect Benghazi from the alleged massacre was a lie. Watch the whole interview at https://www.temehu.com/ntc.htm#abduljalilDeceivedByIslamists 

 

?

On the 28th of January 2015 The Washington Times published an article titled: "Exclusive: Secret tapes undermine Hillary Clinton on Libyan war", in which one learns that American officials told The Washington Times "that Mrs. Clinton’s strong advocacy for intervention against the Libyan regime rested more on speculative arguments of what might happen to civilians than on facts reported from the ground" [1]. But wait a minute, haven't we been told that the decision was the UN's decision to protect the Libyans by bombing them back to the savage age? And good morning; why 2015?

Apparently, according to this report we are led to believe that the American government was misled to effect war based on misguided information propounded by 3 American women, despite the fact that many Libyans including government officials were warning the UN and its military allies of the foreign radicals being armed by some of the countries they authorised to bomb Libya. And wait a minute, why blame women for the mess imposed by men at the so-called UN?

The notion that they were "misguided" is also questionable because if like the report says the Pentagon and the Intelligence Community were worried that, "Mrs. Clinton was selling the war on exaggerated pretenses" [1], why then bomb a sovereign country without having the facts on the table; why reject the exit strategy proposed in Istanbul; and why leave the country so soon without protecting the civilians the UN resolution allegedly called-for?

Why leave so soon without protecting the civilians the country was destroyed for? In fact the reckless actions of the UN had placed the Libyan civilians in greater danger than ever before in Libya's entire history based on misrepresentation of truth – that is based on lies. This would lead to conclude that it is not easy to reconcile this tragedy with simple misguided speculation; and like the New York Times had said, "We will probably never get to have a meaningful discussion about this, as long as we are tantalized by theories about conspiracies or political malfeasance" [2].

[1] washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/29/hillary-clinton-libya-war-genocide-narrative-rejec/
[2] nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/the-deeper-blame-for-benghazi.html?pagewanted=2&_r=4&emc=eta1

 

Gaddafi Calls For United Nation Investigation

05/06 March 2011: Muammar Gaddafi, in an interview with the French newspaper Le Journal du Dimanche, said: "First of all I would like that an investigatory commission of the United  Nations or the African Union comes here to Libya". "We will let this panel work unhampered . . . I am surprised that nobody understands that this is a fight against terrorism . . . We have helped you a lot these past few years. So why is it that when we are in a fight against terrorism here in Libya no one helps us in return?"

Shortly after the UN-authorised bombing campaign came to an end, reports from Libya and from the world's media began to openly talk about (new) Libya becoming a "Jihadist Wonderland", else known by MI6 as "Tesco" of the world's illegal arms trade". This was not the kind of protection the Libyans thought they were blessed with, but nonetheless it is what they ended up with without being consulted.

Assuming Gaddafi's warnings were dismissed because of who he was, one still needs to understand why the warnings voiced by NTC's rebel government in that "the United States was allowing Qatar to arm extremist groups opposed to the new leadership" [1] were seemingly ignored. Was it because "NATO . . . had to be alerted not to interdict the cargo planes and freighters transporting the arms into Libya from Qatar and the emirates, American officials said" [1]?

And assuming the warnings voiced by NTC's prime minster were premature, as many Libyans were told to be patient because democracy "is untidy" and requires time to mature (while terror groups were left to expand in the open background ), one still needs to explain why in 2015 Libya's elected leaders from the House of Representatives (HoR) still say the same thing - the international community is still refusing to help the Libyan army fight terrorism, just as Gaddafi had said in 2011. Strange but 100% not a lie.

[1] nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

 

UN Sends Mission To Tripoli

07 March 2011: the UN responds to Gaddafi's plea and sends an investigatory commission or a humanitarian fact-finding team to Libya. The UN secretary general Ban Ki-Moon appointed Abdelilah Alkhatib, the former foreign minister of Jordan, as his special envoy to Libya to undertake consultations with the Libyan government. Gaddafi also invited foreign journalists to Tripoli to see for themselves what was going on, and even though they were accompanied by government officials no evidence was provided for violence against unarmed civilians, and no planes were reported to have been bombing civilians targets.

 

UN Imposes A No-Fly Zone Over Libya To Protect Civilians

17 March 2011: Security Council imposes a no-fly zone over Libya to "protect civilians", and authorises "all necessary measures" (including violence) to enforce the resolution. The resolution demands an immediate ceasefire and a complete end to violence and attacks against "civilians" in Libya, even though there were no attacks against civilians. The resolution failed to mention if Gaddafi has the right to continue his attacks against "armed rebels" and the "foreign radicals" who were engaged in armed conflict with government troops long before the UN's resolution was imposed.

Ten of the council's 15 members voted in favour of the resolution on Thursday, while Russia, China, Germany, India and Brazil somehow preferred to hang in between, as if straight "yes" or "no" is not substantial-enough to not-abstain! Despite choosing not to use its veto to block the resolution, China's foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said they "have serious reservations about some of the content of the resolution"; while Russian officials, according to Reuters, accused the allies of overstepping their mandate by helping rebels overthrow Gaddafi via a UN resolution which they compared to "medieval calls for crusades".

This clearly indicates the level of transparency entertained by a small group of 15 countries, collectively known as the United Nations of the whole world; where some of the members of the UN felt they were deceived to agreeing to resolutions that hid "implied objectives". The head of the mostly-dictatorial Arab league was shocked to see the scale of destruction Libya endured in the first day of the bombing campaign and angrily faced the cameras saying that was not what they understood by the no-fly zone; but by the evening he was brought back to the "table" by dedicated diplomacy, of course.

It later emerged that the resolution contained "implicit objectives", experts say, to change the regime, back the rebels with bombs, and destroy Libya's entire infrastructure in order to weaken the government that was perceived as a threat to civilians, because, like one Western leader had said, as long as Gaddafi remains in power the threat to civilians will not go away. Hence, it was no secret to Lord Dannatt that "the mission under UNHCR 1973 is . . . to protect people but of course the implied task . . . is the removal of Colonel Gaddafi".

This is clearly a new application of UN powers to effect regime change in designated states. No matter what the UN now says or does, arming civilians, rebels and "moderate radicals" should not to be tried at home. Encouraging teenagers to use violence is the last thing responsible diplomats ought to have in mind, simply because peace and science are the only principles for lasting stability and prosperous success; and if the UN is yet to see this simple recipe, they are more than welcome to tour the "jihadist wonderland" they helped create and see for themselves the wreckage once was "sovereign Libya". 

 

Libya Declares Ceasefire

The UN Resolution 1973 calls for an immediate cease-fire in Libya; a dialogue between the parties involved in the armed conflict; and the protection of civilians by all necessary measures. The Libyan government responded immediately by announcing that they fully agree with the resolution and declared a cease-fire on the 18th of March 2011.

The NTC and reportedly the UN rejected the offer, stating that there was no withdrawal of government forces from the "rebelled areas". Some western leaders followed by declaring that Gaddafi cannot be trusted, especially after the mysterious incident of shooting down a military plane over Benghazi, and as a result the bombing of Libya commenced shortly afterwards.

The video tube shown by the media to prove that Gaddafi's forces continued to fire at "armed rebels" in Misrata can hardly be acceptable evidence, since al-Jazeera itself (and all other media outlets) always say the footage "cannot be independently verified" - a kind of disclaimer that follows every amateur Youtube video shown as evidence. If the video shows anything at all it has to be the fact that Gaddafi's troops were fighting armed fighters and not peaceful civilians, many of whom were "bearded men" firing at invisible targets (presumably government soldiers).

Here is the full story of shooting down the plane over Benghazi, which appears to have been staged in order to show that Gaddafi cannot be trusted with his ceasefire. The video was first broadcast by al-Jazeera and uploaded to their Youtube channel on the 19th of March 2011 - coincidently just one day after Gaddafi declared a ceasefire.

 

youtube.com/watch?v=t0CW040PQII

"The downing of a plane above Benghazi; shot down by pro-democracy rebels;
it now appears this may have been an own goal; the rebels shooting down one of the jets on their side."

Al-Jazeera said the plane took off from Benghazi and was shot down by rebels from Benghazi, and specifically used the term: "own goal". Of course, about one hour later, the  media said the plane was shot down by Libyan government forces. A few hours later, precisely at 16:45 GMT, 20 French planes began the bombing campaign of Libya.

Why should rebel fighters fly a plane over Benghazi when they knew there was a no-fly zone in effect?
How come this was the only plane, ever, to be used by the rebels in the entire war at that crucial moment?
What is the evidence provided that the plane was shot down by Libyan government forces?
Was the downing of the plane a rebel stunt to show that Gaddafi cannot be trusted with his ceasefire?
Why did al-Jazeera change its story around an hour after it first made the announcement?

 

The UN Military Operations In Libya

The UN military operations in Libya began on the 19th of March 2011, and continued until the 31st of October 2011. The implementation of the UN authorisation for military operations against sovereign Libya was first commanded by American forces, before it was handed over to European forces. In total 18 countries took part in the military operations against Libya, including Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Holland, Canada, Belgium, Bulgaria, Romania, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Turkey, UK, USA, Qatar, Jordan and UAE; with 32 more countries provided non-military support for the war on Libya.

 

Other False Facts Engineered To Impose The No-Fly Zone

• Air Force Zero: even though there was no evidence showing the Libyan Air Force bombing "civilian" targets, the propaganda was used to introduce the need for a "no-fly zone" to protect civilians. The BBC claimed that Gaddafi's planes were firing at protesters, and these claims were repeated by the UN's Secretary General Ban Ki-moon without questioning. A few weeks later American officials confirmed that there was no evidence for such  [fake] reports. Of course, the implied objective of the zone, as was admitted later, was not only to change the regime, but also the consequential destruction of Libya's entire infrastructure; thereby sending the country back to medieval times by turning sovereign Libya into a Jihadist Wonderland, complete with "Tesco" for world terrorists to plunder. These are the practical results of the [hijacked] UN's morality to protect, regardless of the intention. 
  
  
  
• Exaggerated Casualties: the initial reports of 50,000 Libyans killed and 50,000 more injured, widely circulated by western, eastern and southern media outlets without providing a shred of evidence, were later found to be complete lies. Fifteen months later, the newly-created Libyan Ministry of Martyrs & Missing Persons has reduced the outlandish figure down to 5,517 rebels, soldiers and civilians killed during the bombing campaign - a mere 10% of the number given by foreign politicians and government journalists. The reason, of course, was to create the impression of a massacre taking place in Libya during the early days of the bombing campaign. Imagine the true figure of causalities reported from Syria.
  
  
  
• Fakebook Lies:  apparently the UN resolutions to bomb Libya were based mainly on "media reports" that were largely drawn from social media websites such as Facebook. The reports coming from Libyan media regarding the foreign radical activity then taking place in Cyrenaica were ignored as government propaganda; culminating in bombing the Libyan TV Station by the UN-authorised forces. Immediately after the violent uprising hit the airwaves the western media (including al-Jazeera) began showing all kinds of amateur YouTubes and shaky videos of anonymous atrocities that are impossible to verify. To get around this tricky paradox, news readers always say they "cannot independently verify the video" – after they show it, again and again, of course. Why bother showing home-made footage implicating people of horrendous crimes and putting their lives in danger when one cannot independently verify the material at hand? Where are the high standards previously claimed to be the foundation of proper journalism? Understandably, three years later (after Libya was plunged in darkness & chaos) the western media began blaming social media websites for exaggerating the atrocities committed by the Libyan government.
  
  
  
• Libyan Mercenaries: the early reports of foreign mercenaries fighting alongside Gaddafi's forces were also unconfirmed reports, seemingly used to effect social discord and tribal tension as per house rule: "divide and ruin". Illegal immigrants (who had no documentation) were arrested and tortured by the rebels for being mercenaries. Libyan black Tawerghans and black Tuareg Berbers were persecuted, arrested, and tortured for being mercenaries and "greens". This kind of propaganda has resulted in the persecution of hundreds of thousands of Libyans as well as African blacks, with the entire inhabitants of Tawergha being expelled from their town – seemingly with no one in sight to protect. One can only presume that showing Gaddafi bringing in African mercenaries to kill Libyans is good for turning Libyans against him, and against each other, just as shooting people in mosques, raping women and Vaiagra propaganda were. It emerged a few months after the bombing campaign started that foreign mercenaries including radical jihadists from around 12 countries were indeed fighting with the rebel forces against the forces of the Libyan government. When Aljazeera asked some rebels for the apparent contradiction, the rebels replied the foreign mercenaries were helping them with the so-called "revolution" (for some).
  
  
  
• Fake Liberation: the UN's objective to protect civilians from an imaginary massacre by all necessary measures was a complete farce, simply because liberation was declared after the real massacre of civilians was effected. On the 23rd of October 2011 the NTC declared the premature liberation of Libya while the whole country was still in a state of war, as confirmed a year later by the transitional president Dr. Magarief himself. On the 31st of October 2011 the United Nations declared an end to its bombing campaign, apparently success "with precision", while blasting civilian homes was still going on across the stricken country; thereby igniting the real massacre of Benghazi with a barrage of assassinations and bombing campaigns that continue to this day (2015) – with neither protection nor solution in sight but a possible second bombing campaign – this time to protect Europe from the immigrants and the radicals effected in the protected state. 
  
  
  
• The reverberating morality previously employed to destroy the old has now evaporated whence it came; forcing foreign diplomats and UN representatives to flee the country they helped destroy.
  
  
  
• It is "probably" Okay to remove dictators as long as civilians do end up "protected", as promised. But with destruction and bloodshed effected everywhere and hell let loose on earth, one can only say: shame on you UN.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resolution 1970 (2011): United Nations No-Fly Zone Over Libya Resolution. Adopted by the Security Council at its 6491st meeting, on 26 February 2011.

• Download the full UN Resolution 1970
  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Security Council Dist.: General 17 March 2011 Resolution 1973 (2011). Adopted by the Security Council at its 6498th meeting, on 17 March 2011. Recalling its resolution 1970 (2011) of 26 February 2011. Explicitly Resolutions 1970 and 1973 call for protecting the Libyan civilians apparently from an imaginary massacre. But when they are carefully read together they reveal implied objectives to change the regime in Libya, topple Gaddafi from power, and destroy Libya's entire infrastructure without an exit strategy. Once Libya was destroyed it was abandoned to the clutches of criminals, islamist politicians, militant militias, chaos, and all kinds of terror groups from all over the world. Libya truly became free for all.

 

Download The UN Resolution 1973

Download The UN Extended Support Mission in Libya

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Waiting until hundreds of militias and terror groups took full advantage of the chaos inflicted on Libyans in 2011;
and after ignoring all the cries from the Libyan people and independent media for help during the past three years;
and after Libya was flooded with illegal immigrants, weapons, drugs, corruption and crime;
and after all traditional values in Libya were destroyed in the name of protection;
and after many foreign groups took full advantage of lawless Libya;
and after creating "Tesco" for world terrorists to enjoy";
and after turning Libya into a "Jihadist Wonderland";
and after bringing Libya to its knees;

the UN has at last decided on the 27th of August 2014 to merely call for a ceasefire and apply "sanction" to those who decide to threaten the "stability" and "democracy" of Libya. It is not clear what kind of democracy or stability the UN is referring to! The resolution even "condemns the use of violence" when the UN itself authorised violence against the wishes of  many Libyans who called for dialogue instead.

The alleged objective is to protect civilians, no doubt, but like the previous resolutions this latest resolution may also harbour "implied objectives" the Libyans and others could only endure in years to come. For example, by declaring a number of installed organisations as "terror groups", and from the scale of the immigration disaster effected after the bombing campaign, Libya will become a future bombing target simply because it is now perceived as a threat to the whole region including Europe, of course.

If foreigners want to help Libyans then they must provide (in advance) a complete program with an exit strategy to demonstrate the expected results. Such exit strategy would then be put for a referendum by the Libyan people to approve or else reject. Imposing destruction on sovereign nations in the name of protection only to turn round and say it was a "mistake" is an absurd tragedy unfortunate nations could only endure. 

 

 

Download UN Resolution 2174 of 2014

Source: https://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2014/sc11537.doc.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

After repeated failures and disagreements the UN-imposed Libyan Political Agreement (LPA) was signed  in Skhirat, Morocco, on the 17th of December 2015. The UN's decision was outlined by its resolution 2259. The agreement imposes a "Presidency Council" on the Libyan people, while ignoring the democratically-elected HoR government.

According to the Guardian the UN's "appointed government" is a "calculated risk" taken by the UN after turning its back on the elected HoR. But the reality, of course, the imposed government is a calculated "dictatorship" in violation of the signed draft agreement and in violation of the UN's mandate which stipulates only "mediation" between the elected government and outlaw militias.

Such UN-imposed dictatorship had effectively forced the elected government of Tobruk to "cut its own throat" by cutting a deal with the armed militias that hijacked Tripoli. (See GNA for more on this disagreement.)

It took the HoR nearly eight months to respond to this violation (see UN Violations tab, above).

 

Download UNSC Resolution 2259

Download The Libyan Political Agreement (LPA) - English

Download The Libyan Political Agreement (LPA) - Arabic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More shoddy resolutions from the so-called United Nations. Resolution 2291, adopted on Monday the 13th of June 2016, extends the mandate of UNSMIL by six months, while Libya continues to suffer the destructive consequences of the UN-authorised bombing campaign.

Followed by resolution 2292, adopted on Tuesday the 14th of June 2016, which "authorizes inspection of suspected embargo-breaking vessels off Libya’s coast", after irresponsibly letting loose Libya's arsenal for the world to reap.

Resolution 2292 is "not being very honest” about the presence of the so-called "State" and other radical groups, and even harbours hidden agenda "to manage the flow of weapons to Libya", Russia was reported to have said [1].

From the promised protection that never materialised, and from the current state of misery Libya made to needlessly endure, such hidden agendas appear to be more real than reality itself.

 

Download UN Resolution 2291

Download UN Resolution 2292

 

 

References

[1] Russia says UN has hidden agenda: http://www.un.org/press/en/2016/sc12401.doc.htm
[2] Resolution 2291:http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2291(2016)
[3] Resolution 2292:http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2292(2016)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download UN Resolution 2486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download UN Resolution 2509

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download UN Resolution 2510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download UN Resolution 2542

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hijacked UN

 

 

• According to many Libyan politicians and analysts the UN has no interest in protecting the Libyan civilians "by all necessary measures" because it is the "actions" and the "results" that matter, not the "words".
  
  
• Many Libyans say the UN's activity in practice results in more destruction of Libya's unity, after having destroyed Libya's entire infrastructure via its bombing campaign in 2011, before letting-it-be-infected with terror and chaos. Listen to this discussion, for example, and this one, and many more if you look.
  
  
• Many Libyans believe the UN is the main reason behind extending the Libyan tragedy, and as long as the UN and other foreign entities continue to interfere in Libya's sovereignty the agony will not disappear; it will get worse, they say.
  
  
• The UN claimed to be helping the Libyans for the past ten years and yet there is no solution on sight, except more mayhem, more disasters, more governments, more violence, more violations, more suffering, more pain, more darkness, and hundreds more of mind-boggling tragedies that no one dares to mention.
  
  
• Most Libyans generally agree that the UN should leave Libya and should leave Libya alone. In fact many Libyans believe that as soon as the UN leaves Libya terror would disappear, just as it arrived with the UN bombs in 2011.

 

Therefore, and in practice, if there is an organisation that is evil in this world it has to be the UN — meaning the hijacked UN, and not the UN the 'concept' the people aspire-to worldwide.

Why?

Because authorising violence for the alleged protection of civilians when talking about peace is hypocritical and even debatable (since violence is never the answer and since violence is evil); but authorising violence based on lies, to destroy the entire infrastructure of the country (thereby placing civilians in greater danger than ever before), then abandon it to the clutches of world terrorists and criminals, only to turn round a few years later, to say their Libya job was "unintentional mistake", then do nothing to rectify the mistake (in practice) is, without a doubt, pure evil. And guess what: it is the Libyans who take the blame.

It might seem harsh to use such terms to refer to the so-called "UN", but reading the rest of this page (and other pages) will make it clear that what the UN had done to Libya in the name of protection is nothing more than top destruction.

 

• This has convinced many Libyans (and many more from around the world) that the UN is not a peaceful union of the world's nations; it is an aggregation of the ten most richest and powerful states in the world. All UN resolutions are meaningless and can only be implemented when the big ten say so. Surely everyone agrees this is not a world union as we know the word. Hence according to HoR member Ali Tekbali, the UN does not represent "justice" in the world but it represents the opinion of the "powerful" [42].
  
  
• That is the UN is a deceptive, smart system designed to manipulate the planet according to hidden agendas (agenda 21, agenda 2030, etc.), where elite leaders can walk in and come out with bombing-warrants to bomb sovereign nations based on lies — the lies they later claim to have been no more than "unintentional mistakes". The lies that ruined the lives of everyone in Libya. The lies that ruined the lives of everyone in Libya. The lies that ruined the lives of everyone in Libya, except perhaps the installed elite.

The following is only a small list of the violations committed by the UN in Libya, so far (latest first):

 

 

33 - The UN Violates The JCC Outcome By Imposing The LC

The Legal Committee [LC] was formed from the UN-imposed LPDF members in accordance with Article 4 of the "LPDF Road Map". The committee consists of 17 members, whom the UN claims to have volunteered for the job. The 17 members were reported to have no legal expertise [48].

According to the UN's website, "Article 4 of the Roadmap stipulates that the mandate of the Legal Committee is to follow up on the progress of the constitutional process" [49] (لمتابعة التقدم في المسار الدستوري). Yet, in reality the LC had actually violated the Libyan Constitutional Declaration by becoming a constitutional committee itself.

Instead of "following up" what the constitutional committee does or had done, they reconvened recently (7-10 April 2021) in Tunis to create a constitutional base to decide if "presidential elections" be held in December or not (something they failed to do), and to prepare the legal foundations for the "parliamentarian elections" (which they said they succeeded to do but failed to publish any details).

Such legal duties clearly have nothing to do with "follow up", as alleged by the UN in its website [49]. It is however typical of most initiatives imposed (or organised) by the UN; and, according to some Libyan analysts and legal experts, is a clear violation of both the outcome of the Joint Constitutional Committee (JCC) (held in Gherdaqa on the 9th of February 2021), and of the mandate (or Article 4 of the Roadmap) by which the LC itself was created.

Watch the following two videos for detailed information about the violations as voiced by members of the Libyan Constitutional Committee themselves and by other Libyan legal experts.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3FStul0FXs
The Legal Committee postpones presidential election mechanism!

 

Of particular importance is the statement made by Nadia Omran (a member of the Constitutional Committee) in which she noted how the UN and its legal committee had violated the agreement reached in Gherdaqa (الغردقة), Egypt, in relation to the JCC. For those readers and politicians who do not know what the JCC is, or are not aware of the outcome of the Gherdaqa conference, here is a quick reminder:

• First of all, the conference took place very recently (on the 9th of February 2021) and therefore for the UN and others to ignore its outcome is strange.
• Secondly, the conference in Gherdaqa was actually organised by the UN itself, and therefore for the UN to ignore its outcome is even more bizarre.
• Thirdly, the conference in Gherdaqa included the "Joint Constitution Committee" (JCC). The JCC is made of members from the HoR and the HCS. The head of the Libyan HNEC, Mr. Imad Sayeh, was also present, in addition to the organiser: the UN.
• Fourthly, the JCC discussed what needs to be done regarding the constitutional base, and presented the recommendations to the HoR to include in the Constitutional Declaration (CD) via a constitutional amendment. The conference was concluded on the 9th of February.
• Then for some unknown reason, Tobruk's HoR ignored the outcome of the conference and failed to approve the CD amendment required to pass the the recommendations.
• Tripoli's HCS ignored the outcome too.
• The UN also ignored the outcome of the event it organised, and instead switched to the UN-imposed Legal Committee a few weeks later, in Tunis, to dictate a constitutional base by a "bunch" of Libyans who reportedly are not legal experts [1].

The Libyans should not accept this UN madness. How could the UN get away with this most absurd violation? This is not a game:- create a joint committee to compile a constitutional base; then when they do, ignore the results; and create another committee, in total disregard to the country's institutions and in open violation of the agreed mandates (Article 4).

 

32 - The HoR Condemns UN's Attack on Libyan Sovereignty

 

Around 112 HoR members were outraged by the UN's decision to impose a legislative authority in Libya, stating that such authority can only be elected by the Libyan people [45].

This is a reference to the fact that the LPDF, whose 75 members were selected by the UN, has the right to approve the proposed GNU that will be formed within the next 21 days if the HoR does not approve it. وفي حال لم تمنح الثقة يعود الأمر لأعضاء الـ75 لمنحها الثقة

This new measure, according to the HoR, constitutes a violation by the UN against Libya's sovereignty because only elected authorities can legislate.

One can only guess that the UN resorted to such "treachery" probably to avoid what had happened to the two governments previously proposed by the PC and both of which were rejected by the HoR. The third and last government the PC could have proposed actually never took place; probably because if it did and then rejected by the HoR too, it would have been the end of the PC and so in order to stay in power the PC never formed a third government, and as a result the GNA has been operating illegally ever since, with full international support.

 

31 - The UN imposes a 75-Member committee on the LPDF

• The HoR said that originally the UN supposed to mediate a Libyan Political Dialogue comprising 13 HoR members, 13 HCS members, and 14 independents, but "we were surprised", they said, to see the UN had imposed a long list of 75 members.
• The change of numbers, of course, plays an important role when it comes to s-electing the final members of the interim government (that is now shrouded in bribery allegations). The irony is that any opposition to violations committed by the UN or any other international body against Libya and thus against the Libyan people is ignored, completely, as if never took place. On the other hand, they are readily happy to provide the legal, financial and military support for the defunct governments after they were ousted by the Libyan people via democratic elections ironically supervised by them.

The HoR published its 13-member list for the political dialogue via Decree 18 of 2020 (قرار-مجلس-النواب-رقم-18-لسنة-2020). The following is a copy of the decree, showing the 13 selected members:

LPDF Members Chosen by the UN

The following is the LPDF list of 75 members selected by the UN against the will of the Libyan Government (the HoR). The Hor presented its list of 13 members to the UN (as documented above), but they were surprised to see the UN publish a list of 75 Members.

 

 

The UN (via its Libyan office: UNSMiL) alleged that it had selected the 75 members from across Libya to represent all segments of the Libyan society. Tell that to the persecuted Berbers and Tebu! The UN has no right to select any member from any segment anywhere in the world, let alone all the 75. It is down to the LIBYANS to do that.

Many Libyan analysts, politicians and even militia leaders said the list selected by the UN does not represent the Libyan population, and instead it includes many ‘‘pro-Qaddafi’’ personalities, many ‘‘Islamists’’, and others from the Muslim-Brotherhood-led, defunct GNC.

Still worse, the UN did not publish its imposed list of 75 candidates until the eve of the start of the so-called "virtual LPDF", and thus not allowing the Libyan people and authorities to reflect on the list. This, according to some Libyans, is a "dirty tactic" to trick the Libyans into submitting to the UN's hidden agenda; otherwise why not reveal the list at least three weeks before the start of the conference so that the Libyan authorities have a say in the matter?

Please see GNU page for a break down of this according to political affiliation and ideology

 

30 - Sabha objects to the UN imposing a Muslim-Brotherhood member to represent them in Geneva

The UN seems to continue, unchallenged, selecting and imposing Muslim-Brotherhood politicians. The latest violation concerns constituency 6 (Saba-Shathi) in Fezzan, southern Libya. The constituency's statement specifically mentions Mr. Abdulla Othman, who is a resident of Tripoli and not of Sabha, and who was picked by the UN to "determine Fezzan's destiny via the Muslim Brotherhood", the statement said.

The statement also rises questions regarding the exclusion of women in Fezzan, and regarding the new conspiracy being woven against Fezzan in particular and against Libya in general.

The following is their statement condemning the UN for its latest violation:

 

 

29 - HoR's Letter to the UN Regarding Selecting HoR Boycotting Member for the dialogue in Geneva

The HoR had objected to the UN selecting a member who had boycotted the HoR to represent them in the political dialogue, stating such act will send the wrong message [46]. The HoR reminded the UN that the active members of the HoR are the only official members of the HoR, and any boycotting member has no legal right to represent the HoR.

 

https://parliament.ly/لجنة-الخارجية-بمجلس-النواب-تبعث-بمذكر/

 

28 - How many interim governments should we expect before the final?

Other members of the HoR also objected to the creation of yet another transitional government, instead of agreeing on a permanent elections to appoint a president, a legislative body and a final government for Libya. Many members and other independent analysts said another transitional government will make matters far worse than they are now, in the same way the the GNA resulted in more chaos and even wars across the country. The UN and its allies were adamant then that the GNA will bring the Libyans together, and end the chaos.

 

27 - Anger over the UN bypassing the CD in favour of the LPA signed in Morocco

A group of seven Libyan political institutions expressed their anger over the UN's decision to impose a legislative authority in violation of the Libyan Constitutional Declaration [47]. The group includes the following institutions:

• التكتل المدني الديمقراطي
• تكتل إحياء ليبيا
• تيار شباب الوسط
• حراك همة شباب 23 أغسطس
• حراك منظمة ليبيا الحديثة بالولايات المتحدة الأميركية
• الحراك الوطني الليبي
• المجموعة الأميركية الليبية

In their statement the seven institutions summarised their concerns as follows:

• الزج بالشرعية السياسية كبديل للشرعية الدستوري
  Considereng the LPA signed in Morocco as the basis for the proposed Roadmap is illegal because the basis of all proposals and agreements must be the Libyan Constitutional Declaration (CD)
• The group fears that such move replaces the constitutional ligitemacy to legislate by a unelected, political one.
• تجاهل للقاعدة الدستورية الواردة في التعديل السابع للإعلان الدستوري، المتضمن توصيات لجنة فبراير
  The group feared that the proposed roadmap ignores the Constitutional Declaration Amendment 7 regarding the recomendations agreed by the February Committee (FC) .
• إسناد قاعدة دستورية للانتخابات إلى مؤسسات معنية بالعملية الدستورية دون تحديدها
  Attributing the constitutional referendum base to unknown institutions without specifying their identities. This leave the door wide open for further violations and disagreements that could deraial the whole process.
• As a result the group reminded the UN to adhere to transparaency and respect the constitutional traditions of Libya.

 

  26 - The UN Envoy To Libya Misleads The UN With A Pack Of Lies

January 2019

The UN's envoy to Libya Number Six was widely criticised by most Libyans including a number of Libyan institutions for debriefing the UN Security Council with fake information about the grave situation in Libya. The Libyan Parliament itself, the HoR, was among the first to denounce the envoy's debriefing [38]. In fact the  President of the House of Representatives (HoR), Advisor Aqila Saleh, accused the UN envoy Ghassan Salame of bias towards the presidential council headed by Fayez Sarraj [39]
(اتهم رئيس مجلس النواب، المستشار عقيلة صالح، المبعوث الأممي غسان سلامة بالانحياز إلى المجلس الرئاسي برئاسة فايز السراج).

The HoR president also said Mr Salame came to support and not to rule Libya (which was also said of his predecessors Kobler and Leon). This had been pointed out by a number of Libyan politicians from the day the UN began negotiations with the Brotherhood-dominated GNC to reintroduce them to power after they lost the elections which brought the HoR to power, and consequently violated the democratic principle they bragged about by imposing the GNA on the will of the Libyan people.

According to Saleh Fhima, a HoR member, it is the UN mission in Libya that is rejecting all solutions coming from Libya [38], as well as it is the UN that is obstructing such solutions; while according to Ziyad Dghim (also a HoR member) it is the UN and its envoy who are the cause of the crisis in Libya to start with [38].

Moreover, according to Tripoli's HCS's member Ben Sharadah, Mr. Salame's actions are an obstacle to achieving a solution to the crisis and may even lead to civil war in Libya [37]. Again, this is not the first time a Libyan official accuses the UN of creating chaos and civil war in Libya (just go through the widely reported anger covered in our pages GNC, HoR and GNA for more info regarding the UN's methods to extend the agony in Libya). The same source [37] also points out a number of violations committed by the UN Envoy Number Six in his debriefing:

• He ignored the achievements of the Libyan army in fighting terror in southern Libya in recent days.
  
  
• He failed to mention the current clashes in Tripoli (ongoing at the time of debriefing) when he said the ceasefire is still being respected and there is improvement in security in Tripoli.
  
  
• He tied the parliamentary elections with the so called National Conference without saying anything about the conference. In fact according to HoR member Ali Saedi, who said he sat with Salame in October 2017 during the talks in Tunisia, Salame specifically said he never said anything of the national conference and he will not say anything of the national conference, which indicates that Salame "does not own what he says" [40].
  
  
• His description of the situation in Derna is not true in that there is no arbitrary arrest nor obstruction of aid. It must be noted that Derna was under the clutches of terror groups including ISIL without anyone from around the world saying anything (including the UN), and that it was the Libyan army which liberated Derna.
  
  
• The financial stability he spoke of does not exist

Of course, replacing Salame with another envoy, would-be number 7, is not going to change anything because it is the UN itself that is the problem and because Tripoli is hijacked by the brotherhood, rightly says HoR member Ali Saedi [40]. Everyone known it was the UN who reinstated the Brotherhood-led GNC to power via the UN-imposed GNA.

In fact two days later the UN contradicted its envoy when they announced their concerns regarding what they called military developments in the south [38]. These so-called military developments are in fact the Libyan army fighting the terror brought to Libya as a direct result of the UN bombing campaign of 2011. Here is an image of the UN concern:

 

 

In the above video clip LNA's spokesman, Mr. Mesmari, spoke of Ghassan Salame (the UN envoy to Libya). To watch the full interview please see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3sAvHoFcUQ

The spokesman of the Libyan Army (LNA) says Salame is intentionally delaying the elections but he does not know why. He says Salame destroyed the promised elections of December 2018 and now he is destroying the spring elections.

Apparently the UN's representative (that is Mr. Salame) justified his change of mind regarding the promised December 2018 elections by noting the terrorist attack on the headquarters of the HNEC last year and that once the new building is built elections will go ahead. But then the attack itself, some Libyans say, is mysterious and no more information were heard of it (with some even saying it could have been an inside job to delay the elections); while on the other hand some analysts say the so-called (cursed) elections could be organised from any other building simply because the head of the HNEC told journalists (after the attack) that they have a complete back up of all the files and that nothing important was destroyed in the attack. The fact that the elections were delayed after the attack some say is an evidence of the conspiracy.

Nonetheless the spokesman of the army criticises Salame for criticising the recent operations of the LNA in Fezzan and says Salame should not be concerned or worried about the army's operations in the south because the army is fighting terror as well as fighting internationally-recognised terrorists. The spokesman also said the UN is training certain militias in Libya.

Most important is that the LNA's spokesman said the Libyan army has succeeded in foiling the massive conspiracy to divide Libya and that everyone knows who created al-Qaeda, ISIL and the Brotherhood in 1922 (adding that some of them were given British nationality), and that Qatar and Turkey are just agents of other powers. However, the dangerous challenges remain, he said. (See conclusion below for more relating to this conspiracy to divide Libya.)

 

 

 

  25 - The UN Violates Its 2018 Promises With Yet Another Change To Prolong The Agony For Another Full Year

January 2019

The UN yet again violates the promises made in 2018 regarding the parliamentary and presidential elections by announcing via its so-called Libya envoy(s) in early 2019 that plan has changed again. The new plan hopes to extend the     Libya agony for the entire 2019 by postponing both the constitutional referendum and the presidential elections to the end of the year while preparing yet again for another parliamentary elections by the spring of 2019. The original plan stated that both the parliamentary and the presidential elections will be held together on a sold "constitutional base", but unfortunately the UN and its allies are pressing ahead yet again with another disastrous elections without a constitutional referendum.

 

  24 - 40 HoR Members Denounce Salame For His Criticism At UNSC

8 November 2018

Forty HoR members have accused the UN envoy to Libya for distorting the image of the HoR at the UN Security Council meeting. Apparently the envoy have accused the House of Representative of time-wasting and being against holding elections. Tit for tat is the title of the childish politics that leaves civilians in severe pain.

The 40 members also expressed their concerns over the UN's lack of neutrality. This is not the first time the elected parliament of Libya notes the apparent UN's partiality towards the rulers of Tripoli who hijacked power from the elected government in a military coup in 2014 beneath the world's eyes and with followed UN support.

While the UN is accusing the HoR of time-wasting and not wanting to hold elections it must be noted that to most Libyans the elections themselves have become a farce, a rotten game the UN uses to waste time and extend the agony in Libya.

The Libyans have been asking for many years now the simple question the international community and their media blatantly continue to ignore: how many elections and how many governments  DOES Libya need?  Probably three; one of each region; before the UN splits Libya into three destroyed States.

 

  23 - The UN Extends Its Sanctions Against Libya

5 November 2018

The all-powerful members of the UN have extended their sanctions (and punishment) against Libya until 20/2/2020. Catch 22 to Timbuktu.

The elected Libyan parliament has been asking the UN for many years now to lift its sanctions against the Libyan army so that the army can equip itself to fight the imposed terror and return stability to Libya.

The UN still refuses to help the Libyan army fight terror. Instead rouge states are allowed to sponsor and arm terror groups in Libya despite the so-called UN embargo! The Libyan army is also complaining to the UN about such states violating the embargo but unfortunately "catch 44".

 

  22 - Is the UN Prolonging The Political Division in Libya, Mr. Nassia Asked?

22 October 2018

 

نصية يستغرب «تجاهل» البعثة الأممية للتقدم الحاصل في توحيد السلطة التنفيذية

The Chairman of the HoR's Dialogue Committee (of the elected Libyan parliament), Mr Nassia, has expressed his concerns regarding the UN's disregard for the recent progress achieved between the HoR and the HCS in relation to uniting the executive authority.  Mr. Nassia asked if the UN's lack of response is due to the UN's desire to extend the division amongst the two governments in Libya, or else due to the UN's desire to prolong its mission in Libya [18, 19].

Of course, the question is: what is the UN's mission in Libya? Is it to divide Libya into three states or spread weapons and wars across the whole region?

 

  21 - UN Imposes A Third Government on The Will of The Libyan People

2018

Having imposed its second government (namely the PC) the UN now is in the process of imposing a third government through its 20SRM and the 2018 elections. Like before, most experts agree that the forthcoming elections would definitely destroy Libya because of lack of security institutions and because of the absence of a unified army to ensure protection for the new government. This time round the third UN-imposed government may exile itself to Fezzan, thereby creating three governments in Libya  —   governments by the bucket. Let us hope these three governments keep Libya's three regions (Tripolitania, Cyrenaica and Fezzan) united.

The fact that this latest ploy from the UN was enacted in Paris (and thus the so-called Paris Agreement [PA]) shows that southern Fezzan may end up under the influence of colonial France (in line with Mali and Niger), while Tripolitania's brotherhood would be supported by the West, and Cyrenaica's army by the East (and thus Russia's support for Haftar's Arab Army).

The UN has already proved to the whole world that it is a useless organisation that has failed the Libyan people when its imposed PC (else known as GNA) failed to achieve anything at all but more mayhem, more militia groups and more wars. Why should the Libyans, or anyone else for that matter, trust the UN ever again?

The answer is that most Libyans do not trust the UN, but unfortunately the UN's imposed and selected agents ensure its influence without the Libyans' approval, and seemingly without anyone knowing what is going on

The UN itself admitted that the PC they imposed on the Libyans has failed and that only elections (of a third government) would see Libya out of the UN-imposed quagmire. Really?

• Elections without providing any security; elections without dismantling the hundreds of militia groups, many of which were created, armed and trained by Western states in 2011  — the militias the Skhirat agreement said must be abolished or integrated into the army and yet the illegal GNA created more militias while the UN stood watching.
  
  
• How can this be allowed? Why is the UN allowed to commit violation after another while the Libyans continue to suffer the consequences of the horribly-gone-wrong imposed protection?
  
  
• Go home UN and leave us alone; the Libyans had enough with your destructive protection, useless plans, implicit agendas, and un-intentional mistakes.

 

  20 - UN Stipulates Libyans Sign Acceptance of Election Results in Advance

April 2018

The UN  continues to impose its strange policy to drive Libya towards division despite the Libyans' opposition to all international interference in Libya's sovereign affairs. The latest UN violation stipulates that the Libyans provide guarantees to the UN that they will respect the outcome of the forthcoming election results no matter what.

According to the UN envoy to Libya, Mr. Salame, this condition is necessary to avoid the failure of 2014 elections where one party did not accept the results [43]. However, this justification is fake simply because it was the UN that re-instated the defunct GNC to power after their failure in the 2014 elections, and that it was the UN that forced the HoR to negotiate with the defunct GNC, and it was the UN that eventually imposed its PC (and illegal GNA) on the will of the Libyan people in total violation of the democratic principle they usually brag about before the media.

Hence according to the Guardian, the UN's "appointed government", meaning the PC and its GNA, is a "calculated risk" [44] taken by the UN after turning its back on the elected government (the HoR); which according to other analysts the UN-imposed dictatorship tantamounted to forcing the elected government of Tobruk to "cut its own throat" by cutting a deal with the armed militias that hijacked Tripoli

Nonetheless, this is impossible to implement because the Libyans have already told the world that it was the UN's dictatorship that imposed the various militias on the will of the Libyan people and that as long as these militias are still protected there will never be success in Libya of anything, let alone fascist elections that barred the natives from constitutional rights; leading one to conclude that the UN is yet again cooking more disasters in the background.

We believe the UN is saying this now for two reasons:

1. To justify the mess they imposed on the will of the Libyan people in 2014 and lay the blame elsewhere for the failure of the 2014 elections when it is clearly it was the UN that was responsible for the return of the GNC under the cloak of GNA.
2. And secondly as a disclaimer for later, when evidently things are going to go wrong, to say look: we told all Libyan parties to accept the results in advance, and thus again to blame the Libyans for its own evil mess. The Libyans had already elected many governments so far and therefore why would they need to elect another disaster?

 

 

  19 - 67 HoR Members Condemn UN Actions in Libya

16 April 2018

Sixty seven HoR members (of the Libyan Parliament) have condemned UNSML's role in Libya as “a blatant interference in the Libyan affairs”. They said it is becoming apparent that the "international parties" are "tampering" with the Libyan issue by obstructing efforts to resolve the problem.

Although the 67 MPs expressed fears that the UN  might be a tool for such international parties to achieve their hidden agendas, to most Libyans it is clear that the UN itself is using the international parties to effect its implied objectives to reshape the world's borders and redistribute resources according to its hidden agendas.

To most Libyans the UN now is nothing but a dictatorial organisation that uses protection to destroy countries in a slow process that drags-on for years upon years of pain and suffering. Their constant meddling in Libya's affairs that are driving Libya towards division are the best evidence for such hidden agendas. It is not the words that matter but the actions and the results that speak volumes without a single, rotten word.

 

 

The 67 MPs said the UN continues to extend the Libyans' agony by pushing for a fourth transition phase that is not based on a final constitution. The irony is that many Libyans said this immediately after the NTC imposed its foreign-written Constitutional Declaration in 2011 but no one took notice.  Mahmoud Jibril did mention that the UN-authorised forces that were bombing Libya seemed to want certain groups take over Tripoli other than those designated by the NTC (see Army page for NTC's leader's confessions and the Western support for the Brotherhood). By shear coincidence the Brotherhood had control of Libya's Tripolitania ever since while the Libyans were left to heal their deepest wounds in the background without any means. This proves that the hidden intention of the UN is to create a third government which will be exiled to Fezzan and probably will include Gaddafi's loyalists. What Libyans need, and what Libyans have been saying since 2011, is very simple: constitution first, then one election to elect the government and the president. Nothing more. Unfortunately the UN has been extending the agony since its bombing campaign destroyed Libya's entire infrastructure so that Libya become easy cake.

 

  18 - UN Proposes Yet Another Rejected Initiative

21 November 2017

UN's proposal for amending the LPA in relation to the executive government was accepted by the HoR [22] but rejected by the HCS [23]. The saga continues.

 

  17 - UN Decides 2018 Elections Will Go Ahead Regardless !

28 November 2017

The UN once again has decided to impose its authority by continuing to meddle in Libya's affairs. Shockingly, this time the UN has decided that the 2018 elections will go ahead regardless of whether the Libyans have reached an agreement or not over the UN-proposed road-map.  Of course, the UN knows best what is best for Libya; after all they have been doing just that for seven years now - and still counting to *armajadoooooooooooooooooon. 

1/1/2019 Update:

The UN has changed its mind, once again, and said the elections will be held before the end of 2019. Amazing stuff!

 

  16 - UN Specifies Election Conditions

2 December 2017

The UN imposes a new set of conditions according to which the 2018 elections will be held in Libya. The UN also decided that voter registration can start this month. Thank you very much. Among the conditions stipulated are:

1. Technical condition: registering as many voters as possible for the upcoming elections to ensure adequate participation.
   
   
2. Legislative condition: the existence of legislative preparation according to which the elections would be completed.
   
   
3. Political condition: all parties should agree to accepting the results of the forthcoming third elections in advance — presumably even if the results end up tampered-with, as was the case in previous elections the UN called "transparent" — the elections that barred the Berbers from taking part in party elections; the elections in which ballot boxes were swapped by installed militias.

 

  15 - HoR Member Condemns UN Actions

30 December 2017

HoR member Esa Alareibi condemns the recent actions of the UN mission in Libya: condemns the bizarre behaviour of the UN: النائب عيسى العريبي يستهجن التصرفات الأخيرة للبعثة الأممية في ليبيا
[3]

 

  14 - Activist Azza Maghur Accuses UNSMIL of Double Standards

December 2017

It makes one feel at ease when other Libyans talk about the violations committed by the UN in Libya; at least you get the feeling that you are not alone.

The UN's rejection of the HoR's appointment of Mr. Shukri as the governor of the Central Bank of Libya, according to the Libyan lawyer Azza Maghur,  contravenes the Libyan Political Agreement (LPA) as stated under Article 15.

The lawyer has also pointed out a number of violations to which the UN has turned a blind eye [13]. These include:

• The illegal formation of the High State Council in violation of the LPA (as reported in this page immediately after it was formed: see the GNA's HCS tab );
• The election of the presidency of the HCS;
• The issuance of resolutions by the Presidential Council in violation of the LPA;
• The non-replacement of a member of the Presidency Council who resigned;
• The formation of the GNA without the approval of the HoR;
• The conclusion of a bilateral agreement on illegal immigration by the Presidency Council without jurisdiction;
• The continuation in power of the PC and the GNA despite the expiry of the LPA’s two-year limit;
• The failure of the first phase of the 20 of September Road Map (conducted by Ghassan Salame) without reaching consensus between the HoR and the HCS. The HoR had accepted the initiative proposed by Salame (in relation to amending the LPA) but the HCS had rejected it, and yet Salame said nothing. 
  

 

  13 - The 20 of September Road Map Disaster

September 2017

The UN and its allies appear to be addicted to imposing inititives that are doomed to fail. One of the most recent failures is the so-called the 20 of September Road Map [20SRM], which we covered in detail in our GNA page. The following observations illustrate that the whole initiative is wrong, from start to end.

• One of the first criticisms voiced was that the 20SRM was born dead, just like the birth of the PC itself.
  
  
• Many Libyan politicians stated from the start that the 20SRM is nothing more than an attempt to delay stability in Libya and extend the state of chaos engulfing Libya since the UN-authorised bombing campaign was ignited with vengeance.
  
  
• It is not possible for Mr. Ghassan Salame to come up with such a dramatic road-map in this short period of time, Mr. Ezzedin Aqil told Sijal [34]; indicating that the plan was already crafted by other unknown entity (or entities).
  
  
• According to Omar Ehmidan, former spokesman of the former GNC, this road-map proposed by Salame was put forward by Kobler in June 2016 [34].
  
  
• One of the first HoR members to respond to such road-map, Mr. Abdulminaem Balkour (عبد المنعم بلكور), was reported to have said that the proposed UN road-map is incomplete and requires clarification [35]. For example there was no mention of the actual LPA articles that require amending, he said. This point alone leaves the door wide open, once more (just like in December 2015), for further disagreement and discord.
  
  
• Other analysts say most European players are also extending the agony for personal gains and a slice of the "ungoverned space", and therefore many Western states had already declared their support for such disastrous Road-Map. Hence the 20th of September Road-Map, according to CDA member Thow Almansori (ضو المنصوري), is an earthquake and a hurricane that would destroy the political process in Libya and drag the country to its pre-2011 state [34].
  
  
• The 20SRM stipulates amending the Libyan Political Agreement (LPA) that was earlier imposed by the UN in Morocco. Why did not they amend it before they imposed it in 2015? Most Libyans opposed the LPA from the start and yet no one took notice of their concerns! Once again, putting the cart before the horse is UN-intentional.
  
  
• The 20SRM calls for creating a dialogue with the armed groups to integrate them in the political process. It must be noted that many of these groups are radical groups while others are plain terror groups operating in the open and yet the UN wants to negotiate with them. HoR member Dr. B'airah in this video (at 1:58:01) said when in 2014 the dialogue committee met with ambassadors from around the world to talk about forming an accord government (meaning the later GNA) he brought up the problem of militias in the capital and how they might affect the political processssss, the British ambassador (meaning Michael Aron), Dr. B'airah said, told him the international community will kick the militias out of Tripoli once the Libyans agree on an accord government. Interestingly, after the UN imposed its PC, Dr. B'airah said the international community let them down and never delivered their promise to kick the militias out of the stricken capital; which is clearly an act of deception, he added. Emshi, emshi! It must be noted that many of these militias were originally formed by the Western countries during the UN bombing campaign to topple Gaddafi, and they even trained, funded and "coordinated" them (British Foreign Secretary said), of course using Qatar and Turkey as a front for the later blowback.
  
  
• It must be noted that the UN needs to know that its imposed LPA (in December 2015) calls for all militias to leave the capital, and yet the PC arrived only to create more militias with the UN's apparent silence (or implied approval), while the UN now is in the process of imposing yet another disastrous initiative which calls for negotiations with terrorists and armed groups. What else is there to say for heaven's sake other than go to hell UN.
  
  
• According to Libyan lawyer Azza Maghur the HoR had accepted the initiative proposed by Salame (in relation to amending the LPA) but the HCS had rejected it, and yet Salame said nothing [13]. 
  
  
• The already born-dead 20SRM was formerly killed on the 29th of May 2018  when delegates agreed to hold elections on the 10th of December 2018 during the so-called "Paris Agreement"; and therefore instead of LPA we now have PA. Emshi emshi to Palermo.
  
  
• For a full coverage of the 20SRM please see this page: https://www.temehu.com/gna.htm

 

 

  12 - The So-Called National Conference & The HD Lies

September 2017

The National Conference (NC, the المؤتمر الوطني  or المؤتمر الجامع) is the latest trick to come out of the UN's sleeves to extend the Libyan agony. The NCP (the National Conference Process) is a series of conferences held across the country in preparation for the NC. The NCP will be held under the supervision of the UN. The UN has appointed another organisation to run the congress, namely the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD). So who is this HD?

Ironically the website of the UN-appointed HD (https://www.hdcentre.org/activities/libya/) starts its Libya introduction with a pack of lies. Here is how:

"On 15 February 2011, major demonstrations erupted throughout Libya seeking the removal of Muammar Al-Qaddafi."[2]

First of all there were no major demonstrations on the 15th of February 2011. This is a total lie. There was one, single, small protest by women and children on the 15th of February 2011 in Benghazi protesting about Abu Salim prisoners. Turning this to "throughout Libya" is obviously a massive lie, if not beating the drums for foreign invasion and regime change in Libya, as is usually the case.

Secondly this small protest did not call for the removal of Gaddafi; it was calling for the release of prisoners whom Gaddafi imprisoned in 1996 because they (the prisoners) were attacking European embassies in Benghazi, else known as the angry protestors who were protesting against the publication of the controversial "Danish cartoons" printed in Europe. This means that Gaddafi was protecting his European guests from violent hooligans.

 Then the UN-appointed HD continues with more lies:

"They began peacefully but on 17 February, forces loyal to Qaddafi fired on demonstrators, killing hundreds and provoking resignations from some officials in Qaddafi’s own cabinet, several prominent Libyan diplomats and members of the security forces in the eastern region of the country."[2]

Thirdly, the UN-appointed HD claims that the following protests of the 17th of February began peacefully, which is also a lie, since by then we have many international organisations reporting the Libyan operation as an "armed conflict" in which [mysterious] protestors were shooting at government soldiers and burning government buildings. 

Then the UN-appointed HD continues:

"Following a brutal campaign, which exerted a high toll on both sides, revolutionary forces finally overcame the last bastions of Qaddafi support in Sirte on 20 October. Qaddafi was found and killed while fleeing the city."[2]

To say revolutionary forces eventually toppled and killed Gaddafi is also a massive lie, because there was no mention of the simple fact that foreign military might representing nearly 50 countries were bombing Libya day and night for nearly 7 months, completely destroying Libya's entire infrastructure. There was no mention of the fact that Gaddafi's personal convoy was bombed by European military while leaving Sirte, after which he was killed.

Many Libyans believe that faking Libyan history in this manner is a serious violation. Such cheap lies can never justify the violent destruction of Libya by the so-called UN. The Libyans and probably all humans do cherish proper democracy, yes, but not on the expense of loosing their dignity and becoming cheap sheep instead. Please click here to o see a snapshot of the HD webpage regarding their lies about Libya.

 

 

  11 - HoR Warns The UN With International Court

24 August  2016

رئيس مجلس النواب يهدد الأمم المتحدة بمقاضاتها أمام محكمة العدل الدولية في حال إستمرار تعاملها مع الرئاسي وحكومته

The HoR's president (the acting president of Libya Mr. Agila Saleh) was reported to have threatened to take the UN to the International Court (at the Hague) for the violations committed by the UN against Libya's sovereignty and against the Libyan constitution.

The HoR's president had stated in a letter addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday (23/8/2016) that the conduct of the UN is unacceptable [9]. The letter is shown below.

Benghazi's LANA said the letter was sent to the UN via Libya's UN representative Mr. Ibrahim Dabbashi [10], and that the HoR asked the UN to stop dealing with the PC and its unapproved GNA after the HoR's vote (of the 22nd of August 2016).

• The letter states that the representation of Libya at the UN creates more problems that may lead to further divisions among the Libyans. The letter said if the UN continues with such behaviour then the HoR shall be forced to take the UN to the international court for violating both Libya's sovereignty and the Libyan constitution.
  
  
• The letter also warned that the UN's premature recognition of the GNA government (as occurred in its resolution 2259) long before the GNA itself is approved (and still has not been approved to date) does not grant the UN the right to violate the Libyan constitution.
  
  
• The letter said that the UN has no right to impose a group of people under the name of GNA on the Libyan people and consider this group as the only legitimate government in Libya, and even give this government a seat at the UN.
  
  
• The letter said the Libyans had sacrificed thousands of lives to get rid of dictatorship and thus will not accept any form of "new dictatorship" even if this dictatorship came via the United Nations, the organisation that chose to walk over the Libyan constitution:
  (للأمم المتحدة التي اختارت أن تدوس بالأقدام على الإعلان الدستوري الليبي ). [Wow]
  
  
• The letter said the UN knows very well that the GNA does not exist yet, and that all there is is the PC which is instructed to form a GNA government and present it to the HoR for approval. [This point is very important because other western powers apparently began their second bombing campaign of Libya in Sirte in August 2016 based on an invitation from a government that does not exist - namely the GNA - just like the imaginary massacre of Benghazi for the first bombing campaign.]
  
  
• The letter stated that the unconditional support of the UN to the PC, which acts as if it is the GNA, had contributed to the deterioration of the situation in Libya and also allowed the PC to be under the control of militias as well as to violate the LPA.
  
  
• LANA said Mr. Dabbashi had asked the UN to formally direct its invitations to the legitimate authority in Libya as represented by the HoR and Althni's government [10].

 

 

The HoR's Letter warning the UN with international court

 

  10 - The UN Recognises An Illegal Government

2016

The HoR had condemned the UN for recognising the GNA government imposed by the UN-imposed PC without the government securing the required approval from the elected HoR and without constitutional amendment.  The PC had proposed two ministerial cabinets both of which were not approved by the HoR. The HoR (and all Libyans) have been waiting for the PC to propose its third (and last) government ever since the rejection of its second government.

Instead the PC authorised its government to operate without constitutional amendment and without the approval of the elected Libyan parliament. Soon afterward the whole world (including the UN) began dealing with the illegal government as the only legitimate government in Libya, and even striking lucrative business deals and imposing further mayhem on the stricken Libyan people; as well striking bombing warrants to bomb Libyan targets once more across the country, from Awbari to Tazerbu and from Sirte to Sabratha — a second illegal bombing campaign that is still running to this day. Libya is being bombed illegally for seven years now and there is no sight of the alleged protection of civilians anywhere — just more and more terrorists appearing everywhere. Shame on you UN. Evil UN.

 

  9 - UN's Apparent Approval of  The HCS's Illegal Formation In Violation of The LPA

April 2016

The illegal formation of the High State Council in violation of the LPA was previously reported in our HCS page.  A few days after the PC's arrival in the capital Tripoli the HCS held its first meeting in Tripoli in open violation of the LPA; thereby reflecting the same chaotic start that eventually ruined the NTC, the GNC and the HoR. On the 5th of April 2016 some members of the HCS (said to be 73 members) held their first meeting in the capital Tripoli without approval from the parliament. On the following day pro-GNA GNC members (who are confusingly also being reported as members of the HCS) met in  Almahari Hotel in Tripoli and agreed to make a constitutional amendment to the CD; yet again in open violation of the LPA and the NTC-imposed CD. According to this illegal amendment they disbanded the GNC (more-like they renamed it GNA), as well as appointed Mr. Abdulrahman Alsweihli the president of the HCS (with 53 votes), and Salah Almakhzoum as his first deputy (with 43 votes). This illegal violation of the imposed LPA and the CD was welcomed by the international community who shortly afterwards recognised it as the only legitimate government in Libya. Terrible.

When former rebel prime minister of the self-appointed NTC, Mr. Mahmoud Jibril, warned the UN via its envoy to urgently address the dangerous violations committed by the GNC members who self-amended the CD and elected a president for the HCS in violation of the so-called Libyan Political Agreement (LPA) the UN pretended deaf and blind [36]; and for the sake of audacity some European ambassadors even defended the violation (as we reported under our GNA's HCS tab). This means that the UN is continuing to commit violations even against its own agreements and there is no one to stop it/them.

 

  8 - The UN Imposes Its Own President For The UN-Imposed PC

October 2015

One of the main violations eventually endorsed via the so-called LPA is the UN-imposed PC President Mr. Sarraj. Aljazeera also covered this violation right here [28]. The HoR nominated a list of 14 people for the PC presidency and thus the prime minister of the GNA on the 2nd of September 2015, but unfortunately the UN ignored the entire list and went ahead with imposing its own president. The List presented by the HoR includes the following names (13 men and 1 woman):

1. Mustafa Alsalheen Alhouni
2. Mhemed Abida Attargi
3. Nabeel Hemmadi Alghadamsi
4. Aboubaker B'airah
5. Mhemed Younis Lemnefi
6. Abdurrahman Shelgem
7. Dow Abdullah Bodawya
8. Abdulsalam Abduljalil
9. Fathi Almajberi
10. Almahdi Attabawi
11. Alaref Alnayed
12. Jadalla Azouz Attelhi
13. Othman Albaseer
14. Amal Attaher Alhaj

As you can see, the name Fayez Mustafa Alsarraj is not in the list.

 

Similarly, the latest UN-proposed National Accord Government, according to a GNC member [1], was assembled from those who were taking part in the negotiations before the GNC presented its list of candidates.

Probably as a disclaimer the website of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya [2] has confirmed this by stating that, "The GNC as you know decided yesterday not to propose names and to ask for more changes in the text."

 

لقاء خاص مع رئيس المؤتمر الوطني العام نوري أبوسهمين

GNC President, Mr. Nuri Abusahmein, reveals how the UN (via Mr. Leon)
imposed its PC on the will of the Libyan people without consultation with the GNC (at minute 13:48).

This means that neither the HoR's nor the GNC's lists were included, and yet, ironically, media outlets and other obscure websites (such as wikipedia) reported the PC being an agreement struck by the Libyans and mediated by the UN. Pure propaganda.

 

  7 - The Illegal Signing of The Libyan Political Agreement (LPA)

October 2015

After repeated failures and disagreements the UN-imposed Libyan Political Agreement (LPA) was signed by 21 members in Skhirat, Morocco, on the 17th of December 2015. Berber and Tebu representatives have condemned the UN's exclusion of the Berbers and the Tebu from the so-called Libyan Political Dialogue [29] —  presumably the "Arab Spring" is for Arabs only. 

The agreement imposes a "Presidency Council" on the Libyan people — more or less the same presidency council the UN initially proposed before it urged the Libyans to accept it in order to avoid sanctions (or punishment).

In doing so the UN is urging the Libyans to abandon the democratically-elected HoR for which the whole country was destroyed by its bombing campaign in 2011 and instead embrase its own dictatorship once more.

Many Libyans were quick to denounce what they called "the hypocrisy government", with one HoR member even hinting at "dictatorship" being exercised to endorse who should be the president of the so-called "Presidency Council", which he says is a matter entirely for the members of the council to decide once the council has been agreed on.

Libya's ambassador to the UN, Mr. Ibrahim Aldabbashi (إبراهيم الدباشي) was reported by Libyan media to have criticised the tactics of Mr. Leon (the UN envoy to Libya) saying that they show signs of "panic" where Mr. Leon wanders off the main path and gets lost whenever he encounters an obstacle in an attempt from him to please both governments against "legitimacy"; naming one fatal violation which is changing the signed agreement by himself without consultation.

Seven months later, the Libyan prime minister, Mr. Althni, called for the UN to sack Mr. Kobler, the successor of Mr. Leon, for his lack of neutrality and forceful attitude to impose the GNA without achieving the alleged "national accord".

Such UN-imposed dictatorship had effectively forced the elected government of Tobruk to "cut its own throat" by cutting a deal with the armed militias that hijacked Tripoli [30]; while the world was still boasting about the democratic success that barred the Berbers from taking part in party elections in 2012. Strange but true.

 

  6 - Tamazight: Exclusion of Berbers Via Deceit

October 2015

 

Mr. Hisham Ehmadi, member of the Tamazight Supreme Council,
clarifies the council's position to the Berber people regarding the so-called Skhirat Dialogue.

 

According to Mr. Hisham Ehmadi, member of the Tamazight Supreme Council, said the Berber issue was not part of the Skhirat negotiation. He also stated that the Tamazight Council wrote to the UN envoy informing him that the Berbers are not represented in the UN-supervised LPA talks and provided him with a list of the reasons for their lack of participation.

Instead of receiving an invitation from the UN, Mr. Hisham Ehmadi said they were shocked to discover that according to the UN the Berbers were represented at the Skhirat talks.

The Tamazight Council then discovered that they (the UN) went and chose their own Berber representatives, which Mr. Ehmadi called  "flexible, easy personalities" who for personal gains go along with whatever they are told. This means that the UN had deceived the whole world by imposing its own list to represent the Berbers without consultation with the Berbers: bizarre if not childish behaviour.

These imposed representatives are named by Mr. Hisham as: Salem Madi (representing the Imazighen); Musa Alkouni (representing the Imazighen Tuareg, and who later resigned from the PC); and Musa Kousa (representing the Tebu).

This was a disaster because if they (the Tamazight Council) were represented at the LPA talks "is it imaginable", he asked, "we leave out such an important matter as the constitution"? Mr. Hisham had also noted a few more important points (see ALT for more on these).

Two years later, the CDA released its draft constitution in which they denied the Berbers the official recognition denied to them by Gaddafi before them, and yet neither the UN nor anyone else said "begh".

 

  5 - The UN's Envoy To Libya Says Libya Is An Arab Country

October 2015

The Berber and Tebu members of the CDA have condemned the "racist announcement" [33] of the UN's envoy to Libya, Mr. Kobler, who was reported to have said "Libya is an Arab country" [31]. Apparently this is a reference to the statement made by Kobler when he was reported to have said that Libya is an Arab country but also is an African country [32]. Of course, some of us thought Libya is located in South America.

The Berbers (Imazighen) and the Tebu of Libya were deeply affected by such racist remarks. Without a doubt such a statement could only inflame the already charged atmosphere the UN claims to defuse. As noted at the start of this page the Berbers and Tebu were also angry at the UN for not including the Berbers and the Tebu in the so-called Libyan political dialogue [31, 33]. Of course, it is clear the practical results in the real world strongly point to the hidden agenda of clashing one against the other for many decades to come.

 

  4 - The UN Threatens Punishment

October 2015

In a press statement announced on the 17th of October 2015 the so-called UN threatened to punish those Libyans who are working to undermine the successful completion of Libya's political transition, and that the UN's Sanctions Committee is ready to identify (or designate) those who threaten stability and peace in Libya [23,24]. In the same press release the UN urged the Libyans to endorse its [violated] proposal. 

Many GNC members stated that they were not happy with Mr. Leon's misconduct, stating that Mr. Leon has failed to manage the dialogue and that his wrong approach could trigger a "ragging civil war" in Libya [27]: النهج الخاطئ الذي سلكه السيد ليون في التعاطي مع الوضع الليبي كاد أن يدخل البلاد في حرب أهلية طاحنة 

Many Libyans now fear Libya's imposed tragedy will eventually lead to further bombing missions by the caring international community to protect the 2.4 million Libyan civilians the UN now says are in need of further protection, and, of course, to protect Europe, having turned Libya into a transit paradise for immigrants, arms and terrorists.

EU Punishes Libyan Officials

A few weeks later the EU imposed its punishment (or sanctions) on three Libyan officials for obstructing the formation of the so-called unity government — that is for voicing reservations against the violations committed by the UN.

These men are:

1. Nuri Ali Abusahmain (president of defunct GNC)
2. Khalifa Ghweil (prime minister of defunct GNC)
3. Aguila Saleh (president of the elected Libyan Parliament: HoR)

In September 2017 the EU renewed its sanctions by six months, and also said it is prepared to wave the punishment if the Libyan officials stop obstructing the implementation of the UN-imposed LPA [26]. The international community then gradually transferred its support from the elected HoR to the UN-imposed PC, before they began striking lucrative deals and etc.

 

  3 - The UN Violates Its Own Rules: To Hell With Democracy!

October 2015

Having supervised the election of the HoR the UN did nothing to stop the military take over of Tripoli by armed terrorists and radical militias. These militias then went on to install the defunct GNC. Instead of supporting the HoR the UN took sides with the radical militias and their defunct GNC and forced the elected HoR to negotiate a deal with terrorists.

Most Libyans were shocked, and many more complained, but unfortunately there was no one to listen. The UN's (and the world's) support for the defunct GNC practically led to dividing the country into two, which is probably one of the hidden agendas of the UN. [Now (in 2018) the UN is busy imposing a third government.]

Some Western journalists were sharp enough to notice the tragedy and noted that the UN had abandoned the commitment to democracy, "forgetting that an elected government cuts its own throat when it agrees to cut a deal with armed militias".

According to the Guardian, the UN's "appointed government" is a "calculated risk" [16] taken by the UN after turning its back on the elected government.

But the reality, of course, according to many Libyans including the elected congressmen, is a calculated "dictatorship" in violation of the signed draft agreement and in violation of the UN's mandate which stipulates only "mediation" between the two parties. Of course had it not been for the UN's dictatorship we would not have had two parties to deal with — only the elected one will do the job.

The Guardian's use of words such as "appointed government" clearly illustrates how the "UN-imposed government" violates its own rules, in addition to violating the so called Skhirat talks in Morocco. See GNA for full story.

On the 13 of October 2015 around 40 HoR members made a press announcement in which they rejected what they called the illegal proposal of the UN. The announcement was made from inside the parliament [21]. Faraj Bouhashem, the official spokesman of the HoR said the announcement represents the personal opinion of the members which must be respected, but no official decision has been reached as of today [22]. The personal announcement of the 40 HoR members can be translated as follows:

1. The UN proposal violates the Constitutional Declaration.
2. The proposal gave positions to those who do not deserve and do not own.
3. The proposal is sarcastic and degrading legally and morally.
4. The members uphold and respect the principles agreed on the 4th Draft Agreement.
5. The members shall not accept nor agree to the decrees that violate the law, as follows:
   • the members shall not violate or contradict the Constitutional Declaration nor the political dialogue
   • the members shall not violate or contradict the agreement in relation to choosing the council's president.
   • the members shall not accept the appointment of the third deputy without dialogue.
   • the members shall not accept the appointment of persons who have ties with terrorist groups.
   • the members shall not accept the selection of some ministers in opposition to the agreement.

 

 

  2 - UN Authorises The Bombing of Libya Based On Lies

March 2011

Muammar Gaddafi's speech; Thursday 17 March 2011.

Gaddafi addressed the residents of Benghazi late on Thursday, warning them of an impending military operation during which "no mercy" will be shown to rebel fighters who refused to lay down their "weapons". He also said that if they laid down their arms (at minute 03:33 of the video), then they have his "amnesty" and protection. This was interpreted to mean no mercy for the whole city of Benghazi and thus the so-called "massacre of Benghazi" is a lie that is mildly reported by some as "misrepresentation of truth".

Unlike the Iraqi WMD, which America propagated at the UN's headquarters (in America, off course) the Massacre of Benghazi is a lie that is perpetuated by the whole of the UN and therefore a clear evidence, like Gaddafi had said, that the UN is hijacked by rough nations to manipulate the world according to their hidden agendas. It is an evil organisation claiming otherwise; it is an organisation that brags about peace while practicing violence.

 

There was no reference to killing unarmed civilians or massacring Benghazi anywhere in his entire speech. Note that he also urged the Libyans to not surrender their honour to Qatar.

It emerged later that Qatar and Turkey were funding militia groups aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida (see GNA for more on this). A year after Gaddafi's murder Libyans across the state of Libya were burning Qatari flags, and by 2017 Saudi Arabia, Egypt and UAE cut all relations with Qatar which they classified as terror-sponsoring state. The state the UN and its military allies used as a stage to orchestrate their "Libya Job", of course, together with Istanbul — another reported terror-sponsoring capital.

It also emerged later that the armed rebel movement supported by the UN with bombs was led by "moderate militants" who were assisted to power by foreign governments via the UN's actions (implicitly, explicitly, or whatever). Libya never recovered since — or shall we say "job well-done". Shame on you UN.

 

  1 - UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon [Indirectly] Admits The UN Is Hijacked

September 2011

When some helpless people complained that some rouge nations have violated the UN resolutions 1970 and 1973 (as reported by Temehu.com here and here), Mr. Ban Ki-moon replied saying the UN could only urge participating parties to respect the UN resolutions.

Can you believe the answer?

It is sheer audacity that people talk like this are trusted to head the UN. The UN is the highest authority and any other party allegedly taking part in implementing the UN resolutions to protect the Libyan civilians must, and must, abide by the resolution. This is not a zoo we are talking about. We are talking about a sovereign nation that was bombed based on lies, and now the UN blames unnamed parties for the bloodshed and the murder of tens of thousands of Libyans.

When the French were arming rouge rebels in Nafousa Mountain and when "French Gazelle helicopters also took part in simultaneous attacks on different targets in Libya" [14], and when Russia's Sergey Lavrov complained to France and to the commanders of the no-fly-zone that France's act was "a very crude violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1970" [15], Nato's Anders Fogh Rasmussen was reported by Reuters to have responded by saying that the weapons drop was a "unilateral French initiative" [3] and that Nato was not involved.

Can you believe the answer again?

Libya was turned into a zoo where anyone can bomb and go. There is no one to punish the UN for such violations and violent criminal activity.

And, by the way, a year later Ban Ki-moon said the UN will investigate such reports of violations but unfortunately nothing was heard ever since. In fact the UN continues to commit more violations ever since and to this day, imposing more governments on the will of the Libyan people and thus further driving the Libyans towards disintegration — the hidden agenda, some Libyans say.

Imagine the UN investigating the UN!

Maybe one day, when the UN is truly a united congregation of all the nations of the world and not just ten colonial states terrorising the rest. The other five nations (to make up the 15) can always abstain if they had to!

 

  0 - Apparent UN Secret Agenda

Why?

Why did the UN destroy Libya's entire infrastructure based on lies? Why does the UN continue to commit more violations in Libya? Is it legal for the UN to authorise violence then blame other military allies for the consequent violations? IS not there a mechanism to hold all parties responsible by law? Or is the law applicable only to some?

These and other violations committed by the UN and by the military forces authorised by the UN to bomb Libya were noted by various Libyan governments, politicians, political analysts, media outlets and many more independent reporters and bloggers. What is lacking is the question: WHY? Why such violations?

Well, some Western presidents have already answered their violations saying they were "unintentional mistakes", the fault of "somebody else", or just a "shit show” from a "shithole” country, while the UN preferred silence and instead blamed the Libyans for the its own evil mess.

The previous UN violations led to creating two governments in Libya, with the UN taking sides with the UN-imposed PC and its various radical and moderate militias that hijacked power from the elected HoR in 2014 via a military coup. Now the UN is imposing a third government via its so-called 20SRM initiative. Why would the UN do such a thing?

The 20 September Road Map (20SRM) and the 2018 elections (which the whole world is urging, or more-or-less forcing, the Libyans to hold before the end of 2018) would spell more disasters, simply because the conditions attached to the UN-imposed PC (the second government) stipulate dismantling all Libyan militias and military groups, and yet the imposed PC created more militia groups and, worse, the UN is currently in the process of imposing a third government without doing anything regarding these militias and terror groups. In fact the 20SRM is blatantly contradicting the LPA by calling for direct negotiations with these armed groups (many of whom are known terror groups). Why? Its second imposed government is already "forgotten history". Why?

Well, the answer is simple again: so that the third government would also fail (just like the UN-imposed PC) and thus creating three governments in conflict with one another.

Negative Scenario:

It looks increasingly possible that this third UN-imposed government may exile itself to neglected Fezzan, thereby completing the UN's agenda to divide Libya into three states: Tripolitania, Cyrenaica and Fezzan, and thus back to square one.

These governments would then enter in a war with each other, with the colonial masters playing the good guys urging everyone to talk instead, after destroying the entire infrastructure of Libya, of course, and after arming every single Libyan household to the teeth, and after imposing three governments via their smart negotiation techniques, and after setting up these governments against each other (as is the case now between the current two governments and of course the bombed-out Gaddafi's loyalists and all the other marginalised native groups such as the Berbers and the Tebu). Complete mess to say the least.

We already have plenty of evidence to document the beginning of such a war. For example, the UN-imposed PC (and its illegal GNA) in Brotherhood-dominated Tripoli and the HoR in Cyrenaica (and its Arab army led by Haftar) are already in conflict over the neglected Fezzan; with the myriad of foreign militias and the radical groups allowed by the international community to take hold in Fezzan for the past seven years (after destroying the Libyan army during the UN bombing campaign of 2011).

In fact, according to the spokesman of the Libyan Army, and according to Mr. Faysel Aborayqa, the LNA's recent operations in Fezzan (of January 2019) came after the army was convinced that there was a true attempt to separate Fezzan from Libya [41]. This is clear from one simple fact: no one whatsoever (not even the HoR and its LNA) had taken any notice of the tragedy experienced by the Libyans in Fezzan since the UN bombing campaign of 2011. The whole region has been neglected and left wide open to various terror groups and criminal organisations from around the world for the past 8 years. Why?

The silence of the international community can be easily explained by the UN's hidden agenda to divide Libya; but how are we to explain the silence of the various Libyan authorities including the NTC, the GNC, the HoR and the illegal GNA (and its illegal HCS)? Are they part of the hidden agenda themselves? Possibly. The Cyrenaicans have always wanted to separate from the far-away Tripoli; the UN-installed Brotherhood in Tripoli is not popular and therefore they do not seem to mind a slice of the cake; and the destroyed Fezzan could be used to orchestrate the next stage of the saga to create further divisions deep south (as well as west). Algeria is too large to be left alone.

Nonetheless, the hidden grand plan (for the entire region: North Africa, Middle East, and the Far East) seems to involve dividing the State into two blocks fighting each other (government fighting ISIL and the Brotherhood), and this seems to have been accomplished in 2013. For example, the Saudis and the Egyptians are currently bombing their follow countries in Yemen, Libya and Syria. Turkey, Qatar and Sudan, on the other hand, who had swallowed the bait of the State, have been lured to support the Brotherhood across the region against the still-standing governments. The plan seems very simple, but it took nearly a hundred years to accomplish.

This war may eventually drag Algeria, Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan and Egypt before it consumes many more unsuspecting states. This war would then link with the other war currently raging in the Middle East after dragging Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan into the equation before consuming other Muslim countries from the Far East. For a start, the drums already being beaten for Iran versus Arabia. It does not require a degree in political science to guess who would be blamed for such a war. The consequence, of course, is self-annihilation. Get them to destroy themselves.

This war then could be utilised to implement various UN agendas and also achieve miracles in the West. The benefits of such a war to the UN's sustainable development agenda are phenomenal. As far as elite ideologies claim the masses have no master plane for the planet as they do and therefore they are expendable. One can only hope the above Negative Scenario will never happen.

 

Conclusion

Watch full interview at Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORVCy7rs_SM

Mr. Jibril also talks about important and dangerous issues threatening Libya's future. From his revelations and from other reports one can deduce the following points:

• The immigrants issue is not a random problem of refugees trying to get to Europe, but an organised criminal operation, which, as previously noted here, involves certain governments.
• Libya, with its massive territories, rich resources, and its tiny population is thus an ideal target for UN's hidden agendas (Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, as well as an easy target because Libya since the UN bombing campaign of 2011 is not an independent nor sovereign; it is still under the control of the UN and its embargos.
• By stopping immigrants reaching Europe the immigrants actually end up stuck in Libya and thus forcing the Libyan government to provide safe camps for these illegal immigrants (and terrorists hiding as immigrants); and with a bit of media propaganda about migrants being tortured, sold & bought, and abused in Libya, the transitional Libyan government of Tripoli is lured to provide a safe heaven for such immigrants including hospitals and schools; to ultimately become Libyans.
• Thus there are Libyan reports about the Grand Plan to divide Libya and settle "illegal immigrants" in Libya [26]. Probably as a disclaimer, in 2018 the EU admitted that its Sophia Operation has led to more immigrants being stranded in Libya.
• The PC, the GNA and the UN have no right to impose international agreements on Libya during a transitional period. Libya needs a constitution to decide what should and should not be allowed, and then an elected government to implement the law according to the constitution. Therefore the UN and many of the Western countries are immorally taking advantage of the country they destroyed in the name of protection.
• Using terror as an excuse, the UN continues to violate Libya's sovereignty; and continues to impose more failed governments and initiatives, to allow more time to extend the agony into the second decade and thus more precious time to implement its hidden agendas.

Dear Libyans, the key is to keep Libyans busy fighting each other until it is too late for Libyan children to realise what hit them, because by then it becomes nothing more than forgotten history. Open your eyes, and say " No to arms; no to the UN", before it is too late. Instead work towards future Libya.

 

 

Related conclusions here and here

 

References

[1] http://www.presssolidarity.net/news/ONENEWS/116099-العماري_يستغرب_إعلان_ليون_قائمة_مقترحة_لحكومة_التوافق/
[2] unsmil.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3543&ctl=Details&mid=6187&ItemID=2099277
[3] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/6HrAd6RCI8g
[4] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/VLaxQT6xe_s
[5] Agenda 21: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jun/24/agenda-21-conspiracy-theory-sustainability
[6] Agenda 21 (https://www.temehu.com/UN/agenda-21.pdf)
[7] Agenda 2030 (https://www.temehu.com/UN/agenda-2030.pdf)
[8] UN not interested in solving UN-imposed Libya's problem:
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/dDgXs745KzM
[9] alwasat.ly/ar/news/libya/115806/ - Alwasat said the letter was originally published by Libya's UN representative Mr. Ibrahim Dabbashi in his Facebook page.
[10]  http://lananews.com/ar/?p=9537 - LANA said the letter was sent via Ibrahim Dabbashi
[11] Download the HoR's letter to the UN - page 1
[12] Download the HoR's letter to the UN - page 2
[13] https://www.libyaherald.com/2017/12/21/azza-maghur-accuses-unsmil-of-double-standards-on-hors-central-bank-governor-appointment/
[14] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13651736
[15] https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/30/us-libya-idUSTRE7270JP20110630
[16] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/19/libya-unveils-un-backed-government-but-divisions-remain
[17] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/barack-obama-says-david-cameron-allowed-libya-to-become-a-s-show-a6923976.html
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyWPwoRQ-nA
[19] https://www.libyaobserver.ly/inbrief/unsmil-prolonging-political-division-libya-nassia-wonders
[20]
[21] libyaschannel.com/2015/10/13/عدد-من-أعضاء-مجلس-النواب-يرفضون-مقترح-ل/
[22] libyaschannel.com/2015/10/13/27685/
[23] unsmil.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3543&ctl=Details&mid=6187&ItemID=2099291 (in English)
[24] unsmil.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=5120&ctl=Details&mid=8563&ItemID=2099292 (in Arabic)
[25] gnc.gov.ly/news_det_page.aspx?news_id=11319
[26] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/36BiHwn21xU
[27] gnc.gov.ly/legislation_files/635805311502817747.pdf
[28] http://aljazeera.net/news/reportsandinterviews/2015/10/12/إعلان-ليون-يقسم-الليبيين
[29] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Lein-zbTotM
[30] https://www.temehu.com/pictures3/avif3/lib3/alsature-seat-translated-3.avif
(original source: en.alwasat.ly/en/news/opinion/1124/Who-is-supporting-the-expansion-of-terrorism-in-Libya-and-why.htm)
[31] spiegel.de/international/world/german-un-envoy-martin-kobler-on-spread-of-is-in-libya-a-1075475.html
[32] https://www.libyaherald.com/2016/01/27/no-un-sanctions-yet-hor-cannot-unilaterally-amend-libya-deal-kobler/
[33] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Lein-zbTotM
[34] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/ZtUi3utJRik
[35] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/EjkbScOT_m8
[36] https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/QurkXJH9abk
[37] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9ZtKBYjzs
[38] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4b11PhYnG8
[39] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34FDY83kLGk
[40] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqCezdLi11I
[41] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRAq2oDQ00Y
[42] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_MbzY8BLZ8
[43] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9v4F__scw2c
[44] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/19/libya-unveils-un-backed-government-but-divisions-remain
45] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rViNm9sL9g&pbjreload=101
[46] https://parliament.ly/لجنة-الخارجية-بمجلس-النواب-تبعث-بمذكر/
[47] https://www.marsad.ly/ar/2020/12/03/بيان-من-سبعة-تنظيمات-سياسية-ليبية-حول-ا/
[48] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3FStul0FXs
[49] https://unsmil.unmissions.org/unsmil-convenes-lpdf-legal-committee-meeting-constitutional-basis-24-december-elections

 

 

The UN's Panel of Experts Report confirms that bribe offers were made during the UN-supervised LPDF talks in Tunis. Various Libyan reports noted the violations at the time, but the UN stayed silent and went ahead with the talks. After the GNU was s-elected in Geneva, and after it was approved by the HoR in Sirte, the UN announced that at least three LPDF members were offered bribes to vote for the post of "prime minister", later won by Mr. Debeibah, but they (the 3 members) categorically rejected the offers.

Maybe the UN knows who made the offers, and also who he is working for! Is this person still a member of the LPDF?

 

Download the full UN "S-2021-229-A" Report (Arabic)

 

Download the full UN "S-2021-229-E" Report (English)