
A prehistoric painting of a camel covered with black paint.
(1)
We have reported last year in our news page that a "deranged"
Libyan ventured into the sacred territories of Awiss and embarked on
his mission to vandalise some of the priceless prehistoric paintings of the World
Heritage Site of Acacus. Using spray cans he painted over a number of cave drawings
and paintings. Now we have decided to devote a dedicated gallery to these vandalised
paintings, and to other acts of barbarism committed by European tourists and
even by United Nation officials, believe or not. A 12000 year-old giraffe in
Wan Targhit was defaced some time in the past by an unknown vandal, and there
are quite a number of paintings and engravings covered in graffiti in various
areas. The task of protecting these world heritage sites seems impossible; as
it were!
The news began to leak last April (2009) regarding the defacement of some of the prehistoric rock art sites of Awiss, in Acacus, south-west Libya. It is difficult to enumerate the number of damaged pictures, but some reports say at least six or seven cave paintings were covered with paint, some of which were badly damaged. Other sources, like Libyan Oea, state that at least 120 paintings and drawings in total vandalised across seven sites in Acacus including Awiss, Tin Lalen, Tin Shshikh, Tin Newen, and Tihideen (www.oealibya.com/oea-sections/tourism/15751------30----).
The confused vandal was arrested and have been imprisoned
since. Reportedly he was previously working as a tourist guide for the Italian-owned
tourism company Dar Sahara, which owns Dar Ghadames hotel and Dar Awiss campsite
nearby. Apparently it was said that he was acting in revenge for being sacked
by the company. Was he hiding other personal motives? Or was there another motive
that was not reported? Taking a closer look at the damage he inflicted one is
easily inclined to answer: yes, since one of the damaged paintings (see the next
photo) shows a giant fertility scene of making love, which the vandal had covered
with the graffiti word "sex" in
black; thereby indicating a "moral" or "religious" objection
to what-he-probably-thought was an obscene scene. Were it a case of personal
revenge and a protest against an employer the vandal would go about his mission
randomly without picking certain works of art that reveal his inner motives.

A vandalised fertility scene, heavily covered with graffiti long before the vandal covered it in black. The earlier graffiti shows some Tuareg or Berber letters and also some recent Arabic words; which no one took notice of, and which are slowly spreading across the region!



Another fertility scene.
 Dancing Away From Demonic Horror.


The letter "A" is found in most of his graffiti. In this last one, one can see the letters "AL" (bottom right corner).

The vandalised rock art site in Awiss.
News Headlines Regarding The Vandalism
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/003285.html

Tara: (Tara: http://www.africanrockart.org/):
Alec Campbell and David Coulson visited Libya in October 2009 to learn more about the condition of
the Akakus rock art sites that were vandalised in early 2009. They started the adventure in Matkhandouch (Mathendous) in Messak
Sattafet where they noted a number engravings that they had not previously recorded. Then they crossed over to the Erg of Wan Kasa
to to Acacus; where they say they have recorded about 30 new sites:
"One of the most spectacular sites we recorded in the Akakus
Mountains was first recorded by Prof Mauro Cremaschi of the Italian
Libyan Mission. The site contains both paintings (Round Head) and
engravings. The most important panel is an arched, vertical slab of
rock below a massive cliff on which five human figures with circular
heads are carved in bas-relief technique, a style of engraving unique in our experience."
They met the Head of the Italian
Libyan Archaeological Mission, Dr Savino di Lernia, in Acacus where they discussed
collaboration with both the Mission and the DOA, and where di Lernia outlined the status of a
rescue initiative for the recently vandalised paintings and engravings - although it seems unlikely that a rescue operation would be fully successful. (Visit: http://www.africanrockart.org/taranews/news01-10.html, then follow the link to Newsletter 11.)
(2)
Scholarly Saharan Rock Art Vandalism:
Sadly, at this early stage of development, desecration is genetically expected from human
beings. Some visitors, foreign and/or local, have
written or painted over some of the prehistoric paintings, inscribed
their names or initials, and poured water over them to
bring-out the colours for better photos. There are also
several reports of urinating on pictures, superimposing
originals with other symbols, rubbing-off
the heads of
human images and leaving the bodies hideously headless
and covered with horrible graffiti, and even reports of cutting-off some sections
all together to be smuggled out of the country and sold online. Shockingly though, some of these acts were committed by one of the early explorers of these treasures. According to Henri Lhote:
"During a recent trip to Algeria, I was distressed to
learn that vandals have marred several paintings,
some using chain saws to remove entire figures" [National Geographic, August 1987].
All in all, such
acts are condemned by Libyans and by
the international community,
far from the responsible
practices expected and required by modern standard
of civilisation from today's travellers and explorers. But then why should Lhote feel any distress given the fact that he himself reportedly used water to bring out the
colours of the paintings for better photos, as he described in his book, in which he openly, and probably out of ignorance rather than intent, wrote:
"Brenans had noted several of such paintings,
but the best of them seem to have eluded
him, since they are, to all intents and purposes,
invisible to the naked eye and are revealed only
after prolonged sponging down with water . . . We were
able not only to remove from the ochres the layer
of clay dust that covered them, but we were also able
to heighten the tints and thus restore them to
their original vividness
"
(Henri Lhote, Frescoes, 1959,
pp 69 - 72).
Vividness!!!
Now here comes the really shocking news: according to recent published studies, Henri Lhote's team, or one or more member(s) of his team, apparently
faked two (or more) of the images published in his book, like those
Egyptian-like calendar goddesses, which continued to appear in his book
right down to the 70s. The
following composition, which I have redrawn by hand (colours are not real)
to illustrate the Egyptian style, shows some of the images vividly, or vandalisingly, invented by
Lhote's team:
"Our little goddesses with the birds' heads must belong
to an historical period . . . to 1200 B.C.
We know that at this time the Libyans of
the Fezzan were constantly at war with the Egyptians.
Indeed, the Libyans
attempted to conquer the Nile Valley"
(Henri Lhote, Frescoes, 1959, pp 69 - 72).
It remains a puzzle, however, to realise which Fezzan-Egyptian
wars [professor] Lhote was openly referring to. There are no such wars in recorded
history, let alone "constant wars",
that involved the inhabitants of Fezzan and the ancient Egyptians. If he meant
to refer to the Temehu, Tehenu, Meshwash and the Libu tribes who successfully
managed to regain control over conquered Egypt during the 22nd Dynasty then these
tribes were the inhabitants of Eastern Libya or Cyrenaica and not Fezzan. Why
for heaven's sake invent pictures and then publish them as real prehistoric cave
paintings and supplant them with fake history as if Libyans, and the whole of
humanity for that matter, were unable to distinguish between the Amerind-Zulu
wars and the Spartans' invasions of Troy.
(3)
UN Vandalism:

We all hear about UNESCO, World Heritage, and United
Nations as terms associated with
"preservation", "good" and "order", just
as mother United Nations herself is supposed to be! Look away.
Well,
it is baffling to know that prehistoric pictures
from the Western Sahara, including those of buffaloes and elephants, have been vandalised
and defaced by United Nations peacekeepers - specifically
by the personnel attached to the UN mission, known
by its French acronym, Minurso .
One of the worst sites hit is
Lajuad
(
"the Devil Mountain"
) - a place shrouded with mystery
and history. To read more about this, please
visit
the Times Online arts and entertainment page.
(4)
Looting The Sahara:
For further details and for other, more disturbing, related news, see: "Looting the Sahara: The material, intellectual and social implications of the destruction of cultural heritage", by Jeremy Keenan, in The Journal Of North African Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3 & 4, September 2005, pages 471 - 489. Look around the other issues of the journal for more devastating stories about the desecration of Saharan prehistoric art.
You can read more about rock art vandalism at:
http://www.africanrockart.org/danger/vandalism.html
|